Saturday, December 29, 2012

Is this what the founding fathers had in mind?



Amendment II
As ratified by the States in 1791: A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Guns in 1791 WOULD
Guns in 1791 WOULD NOT
Above taken directly from: http://columbiaacs.blogspot.com/2007/11/right-to-bear-ye-olde-arms.html

Sunday, December 23, 2012

Apples and Oranges

Fact:  Each year more people are killed in auto accidents than by any other non-medical means.  Yep: more auto-related deaths than gun-related deaths.  But here’s the difference – when you buy a car, truck, or van – you are buying a mode of transportation first and foremost.  Your last intention is to kill the occupants of your vehicle or of another.  But when you buy a semi-automatic handgun or rifle you should know that it has been specifically designed to expel bullets at a high velocity and with rapid frequency to penetrate skin, muscle, and vital organ tissue of living organisms.  A handgun is specifically designed to kill a human and its light weight and compactness allows it to be used in various settings including restaurants, grocery stores, workplaces, and schools.  And those bad guys for whom you have made your gun purchase – they also have children, wives, husbands, mothers and fathers.  Once you’ve pulled the trigger you’ve impacted all their lives as well.  And the lives of your own family members – you’ve impacted them too.  “That’s the sister of that guy who accidentally shot his teenage son in his own garage.”
Should anybody and everybody be able to buy a Glock, or a Beretta, or an AR-15?  Do we really, honestly NEED the right to buy semi-automatics?
Oh, and the statistic – the one about auto fatalities vs. gun fatalities – that is expected to change.  Guns are expected to win that inauspicious title by the year 2015 – and then we will all be losers.

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

I want to be a Republican!

I want to be able to quickly and easily divide every person and every issue into two categories:  good / evil.
I don’t want to be torn when I hear that my relative is gay.  I want to easily be able to say that he isn’t someone I want to associate with anymore and still sleep like a baby at night.
I want to always confidently know that my values are right:  That marriage is between one man and one woman (preferably of the same race); that people are poor because they’re lazy or evil; that a woman isn’t capable on her own to make an important decision that would affect her unborn fetus; that all members of Islam hate Americans and secretly want to kill everyone in the United States; that taxes are always bad; and that Ronald Reagan was the greatest American who ever lived.
Life would be so much easier if I could just categorize everything and everyone I see the way a Republican can!  My values, my beliefs would be all I need - and anyone who thinks differently, worships another spiritual being, or sympathizes with any communist wealth re-distributor can shove it.
Also, I want to be 2-yrs-old again!  I want to be able to quickly and easily divide every person and every issue into two categories: good / evil…

Friday, July 20, 2012

Not if I shoot you first!

It was not just a saddening event, it was infuriating.  It happened today, but could happen again tomorrow.  Again and again and again it happens year after year but we all just throw our hands up and rhetorically ask, “how could someone do that?!”  Yet, we are not blameless.  We set the stage every year for something like this to happen simply by shrugging and saying that we’ll never do away with guns.  After all, they were good enough for our forefathers – just like tobacco and slavery was.
The events from early this morning in Aurora, CO are just symptoms of the underlying flaw in our culture that says guns are here to stay and they’ll never go away, so why bother?
Does no one else see it?  It is so obvious, so preventable.  Do we really love our possessions so much that we have to be prepared to kill for them?  Do we really love guns that much?
We are oblivious as a society and have such an “us and them” mentality that in the end we aren’t really that troubled by this story as long as it didn’t happen in our community and jeopardize our suburban lifestyle.  We are also fiercely possessive.  Recently at a water park I noticed something about the tubes provided by the park free of charge to be used with many of the rides.  Posted throughout the park were signs asking people to leave tubes in the water as they exited each ride.  It’s a pretty simple concept, right?  Everybody grabs an available tube, does the ride, and then leaves the tube for the next person to use.  Unfortunately the simple concept did not work because people began hoarding tubes at picnic tables and other shaded areas.  Huge stacks of tubes were guarded for over an hour at a time while their temporary owners chatted and dined and drank and dried off.  As a result…you guessed it – all the rides quickly ran out of tubes.  If everybody at the park could have trusted the system and shared – everyone would have had a tube waiting to use at the beginning of every ride.
Like the tubes, we as a society like our big screen T.V.’s,  and our ipads, and our guns.  And we as a society would kill anyone who might threaten to take them away.
Pro-gun argument: “Cars kill people too, but we let private citizens drive millions of them every day.”
A.       True, but car fatalities are a side effect.  The real purpose of cars is as a mode of transportation.  The real purpose of guns is to penetrate skin, connective tissue, muscle, and vital organs.
Pro-gun argument: “Crazies will find a way to get guns, even if we outlaw them.”
A.       True again, but do we need to make it so easy for them to get guns?  Suppose this guy could only get his hands on a couple guns rather than a whole car full…maybe he would have killed one or two fewer people in that theater – wouldn’t that make a big difference to the families of those one or two victims?
Do we really, truly NEED to have guns or has our culture (and the powerful gun lobby) convinced us that we can’t live without them?  Families of the victims at the theater in Aurora, CO probably wish we had lived without them today.

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Park FAIL: Parking while intoxicated...

Seems to be saying to the other car:
"Does my butt look big in this parking space?"

Where is the dangling accessory? If any truck should
have a pair, surely this one qualifies. After all, you’d
have to have big ones to leave your vehicle like this
and expect it to be in fine condition when you return.

Is this some kind of conspiracy?  "Well, he’s already
screwed up on that side, so maybe nobody will notice
if I just skooch over a bit…"

(Dis)honorable mention.           
     Parking while intoxicated (or developmentally disabled).


Wednesday, March 28, 2012

The Hungry for More Games

Movie review: The Hunger Games

The story is set in the future where the whole world, Panem, is divided into a dozen districts - it used to be a baker’s dozen, but the uprising of the inhabitants was nullified by the incineration of district 13 (apparently the number will always be unlucky).  Each year, in lieu of beating the districts into submission, the bad guys (aka the Capital) pluck one boy and one girl from each district to beat each other into submission (to death really) while everyone else watches the live broadcast in streaming video on their mobile devices (Not really – no one paid the cable or phone bills for a long time so the people have to communicate the old-fashioned way - by birds).
Katniss Everdeen, played by the curvaceous Jennifer Lawrence, and her love-struck sidekick Peeta, played by some kid nobody has ever heard of, work together to overcome tremendous odds by surviving the game-makers’ sadistic arena and change the rules of the games forever.
Lawrence is a gem and seems to have read the book and studied the script, which made up for her supporting cast of child actors who might as well have been reading from cue cards.  Lenny Kravitz was an ample Cinna, Katniss’ stylist extraordinaire (As good as any singer-turned-actor).  Elizabeth Banks was ‘eff’-ing spot-on as Effie, the grandiose escort of the district 12 tributes.
Woody Harrelson’s agent probably couldn’t believe his great fortune last year when he got the call that the producer was looking for someone who could wear a wig and stagger around in a drunken stupor during every scene (Finally, all those years of humiliation in seeing his #1 client show up for auditions in a drunken stupor had paid off!).  Although he could do it in his sleep (and quite possibly did in some scenes), Harrelson was a convincing Haymitch, mentor to the district 12 tributes.
The casting of Donald Sutherland as President Snow was sheer brilliance – assuming the script called for a disheveled and bewildered Alzheimer’s patient who had wandered away from the comfort of his warm milk and medications.  I seriously doubt his scraggly beard and sad, hound-dog eyes were what author Suzanne Collins had in mind, but perhaps he was available and cheap to come by.
The only glaring plot-hole was that 2 black tributes were “randomly” chosen from a district comprised mostly of whites (the demographic makeup was confirmed by scenes of isolated riots in their district).  Apparently whites get preferential treatment in post-apocalyptic Panem too.  I can hear the Chris Rock voice-over now: “If you work hard and keep your head low, you can make it – also, it doesn’t hurt if you make nice with the white folks.”
Most of the first 30 to 45 minutes was comprised of bouncy camera work that was presumably to resemble intensity, but felt more like hand-held cinema from the kids of Super 8.  It worked more to induce nausea a la Blair Witch Project than create an intense tone.  The musical score was excellent and the costumes were memorable (think Oscar nominations).  The special effects were not-so-special, but I give a nod to the game makers’ three dimensional workbench (I have GOT to get me one of those!).
The bottom line:  Very good, but not great.  The movie is worth seeing with or without having read the book.  It is only the first of three books in the saga and Hollywood, being Hollywood, will probably split the final story in two.  Hopefully, the inevitable sequels will have a new director to clean the editing and give the stories a more epic feel that they deserve.  I don’t think that director Tim Burton will be available however, judging from the scores of previews of his other films he appears to be cranking out at a pace that would rival Adam Sandler.